Ethic issue in ischemic stroke patients wit thrombolytic therapy.

OBJECTIVE To discuss the ethical challenge in thrombolytic therapy. BACKGROUND Thrombolytic therapy with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-Pa) has been found to be beneficial to the outcome of patients who had a stroke. However, the ethic issue that is related to intravenous rt-Pa infusion has not been discussed. PATIENTS Four patients with a middle cerebral artery (MCA) infarct arrived at the emergency department (ER) of our hospital within 3 hours of stroke onset. All of them violated the guidelines of thrombolytic therapy for patients. The families of three patients insisted on the thrombolytic therapy. Two patients received rt-Pa infusion and two did not. RESULTS Two patients who received rt-Pa infusion experienced hemorrhagic transformation. One died on the fifth day after stroke, and the other one had a poor outcome with a modified ranking scale (mRS) of 5. One of the two patients who did not receive rt-Pa infusion suffered from hemorrhagic transformation and died on the third day after stroke, and the other one had a poor outcome with mRS of 5. CONCLUSIONS These 4 cases highlight the complexity of thrombolytic therapy in patients who violate the guidelines because the families insisted on thrombolytic therapy. No one is sure that the family's decision was the patient's wish. When a stroke patient violates the guidelines of thrombolytic therapy and the family of the patient insists on the thrombolytic therapy, a conversation between patients, patients' families and clinicians is necessary. Physician should tell patient and their families about the high risk of hemorrhagic transformation and mortality. If the family wants to make a decision, physician should request patient or patient's families to sign an against medical advice form and follow the patient's or their family's decision for the outcome.